• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

[基础知识] 给ICB免疫减毒增效的 药物(十九)--肌苷、β-葡聚糖

[复制链接]
3493 0 自学自救 发表于 前天 17:11 |

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
第一部分 肌苷. ~6 ?5 E0 \) q& \3 x; X" g

  M% R8 `: f9 z' S9 X2 | ! e5 D2 q) a  |* F8 J$ Y
《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》 一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验:
/ E& X1 ~1 M2 `4 R' ^
% ]  H3 c3 V$ m, W2 W1、入组患者:172名晚期实体瘤患者,分为 ICB免疫治疗+肌苷组和 ICB免疫治疗组不联合肌苷(该组部分患者联合了化疗或者靶向)两组,每组86名患者。& O$ T) Q4 a3 \6 [% c' m  A
" W2 J) g' F- g0 c; u
2、肌苷用法:口服肌苷片,每天三次,每次0.2克。
- b' o7 y* n* ]0 x5 e
' m. Z3 {+ F3 B4 Y3 f1 U7 I# y3、试验结果:肌苷组和非肌苷组中位PFS (95% CI)分别为7.00(5.31-8.69)和4.40(3.10-5.70)个月(风险比[HR]0.63;95%置信区间为0.44–0.90,p= 0.011),肌苷组PFS提高有统计学意义。ORR分别为26.7%和15.1%(p= 0.061),肌苷组ORR有改善。非肌苷组中位OS为29.67个月(95% CI 17.40–41.94),肌苷组中位OS尚未达到。9 z5 o+ \  P  X. X  Z! B$ w, W
: w9 l& L, D+ D7 S
肌苷组和非肌苷组分别有25名(29%)和31名(36%)患者出现3级和4级不良反应,肌苷组的不良反应趋于减少。
6 n2 M3 N' K3 i1 Q
$ p* ^4 ~* |$ {
# K8 X" s4 s7 y' H. {
) Q  `5 o. p7 @1 m9 |; O第二部分 β-葡聚糖' W, m  q2 q+ p- q

* i# i, h$ b$ ?3 d# m0 r0 q( l : R% H8 c$ T- h5 L% M; {3 V2 h
《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验,β-葡聚糖+pd-1i 恩沃利 + 抗血管生成药物治疗先前pd-1i治疗失败的非小细胞肺癌。
- M3 |6 z) F* J$ Z4 f) K' S ! I" v4 C& K" J. q% j- D
1、入组患者:23名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者之前用pd-1i治疗都已经失败。, n/ V1 P( y( ]6 T# J$ A
# U4 p, ?; U/ I
2、β-葡聚糖用法:每天两次,每次500毫克。
( @! \  k/ Y" V 3 X+ l3 M7 y, t! N) \: b! ?! i, p) m
3、试验结果:ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9%.,PFS 4.3个月,OS 8.9个月。PD-L1阳性和阴性亚组之间的mPFS有显著差异(6.3个月对2.3个月,p = 0.002)。' ~2 {" L  \; k& N
  G; B" o4 w2 e7 A% z* s
52.2%的患者发生了治疗相关的不良事件。最常见的原因是甲状腺功能减退(26.1%)和疲劳(26.1%)。报告了2例(8.7%)3级不良事件。未观察到与死亡相关的不良反应。( ]! `2 ]3 V+ k4 b4 m% V( J/ n

7 Q% i* a0 p' e3 v蛋白质组学分析显示CASP-8、ARG1、MMP12、CD28和CXCL5的水平与对治疗的抗性相关,而CD40-L和EGF的水平与有利的反应相关。
0 f0 C& o/ G0 _* F3 K
" E( c6 A  y6 s1 U( w& |. \(因为患者都是之前用pd-1i都已经失败的患者,所以ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9% 还是很不错的)
# @0 S6 e8 d' V+ i1 y 0 U2 y9 k. p; _5 b* v8 M

3 y, p1 Q  v5 z  I3 jI 《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》7 X' B/ z- L1 i7 R
& I, ]! i- u" ~% d$ h
Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors.
8 H& P1 ~$ j$ C  D  |- v  G 7 m' w( Y0 ~; B% e' x" x" d, X$ |
Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non-inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two-three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336).
- P3 w- ^4 M; |+ o) s2 v
1 f( h/ p5 @8 k$ ?! o. EResults: Among the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non-inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31-8.69) and 4.40 (3.10-5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non-inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40-41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59-1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non-inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non-inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non-inosine group." v+ Z, i5 v/ i( F
  f! T, c; Q2 J0 A* v
Conclusion: Inosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy-related adverse reactions.
# A" p& h; j9 _% L
9 y8 J  T; \( @
1 E# [5 g( |0 r& ^7 x9 q
5 S* E$ K  |8 c8 sII 《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》' }: E) c3 B6 s

9 @6 @5 ?" I+ K+ A  eBackground: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). β-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received β-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis." m' r% Y, F4 p" L' v

4 S. M  w& ~! R. [" V3 J" l9 RResults: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response.4 d% B. T( O% h( p$ }8 z# n4 Y8 s$ r" n; m
2 w  p3 j  W3 |8 j2 ^( t7 Q
Conclusion: β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表